Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33493525›Full record

ReviewKidney international2021

Best practices for correctly identifying coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy.

Hannah A Bullock, Cynthia S Goldsmith, Sara E Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. SARS-CoV-2 Virology.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathology of lung-specific thrombosis and inflammation in COVID-19.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Kidney damage in COVID-19].Nephrologie & therapeutique · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah A BullockSynergy America, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Cynthia S GoldsmithInfectious Diseases Pathology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sara E MillerDepartment of Pathology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: saram@duke.edu.

Funding

Transmission electron microscope (TEM)S10OD026776 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, SARA ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2019
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD026776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This guidance provides clear, concise strategies for identifying coronaviruses by transmission electron microscopy of ultrathin sections of tissues or infected tissue cultures. These include a description of virus morphology as well as cell organelles that can resemble viruses. Biochemical testing and caveats are discussed. Numerous references provide information for documentation and further study.

Indexed as

COVID-19 TestingMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionBenchmarkingCOVID-19HumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2coronaviruscoronavirus electron microscopycoronavirus misidentificationcoronavirus morphologycoronavirus ultrastructuremicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID33493525
PMCPMC7825881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.