Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33493516›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

Structural characterization of Myxococcus xanthus MglC, a component of the polarity control system, and its interactions with its paralog MglB.

Srajan Kapoor, Akriti Kodesia, Nidhi Kalidas, Ashish, Krishan Gopal Thakur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Srajan KapoorStructural Biology Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, G. N. Ramachandran Protein Centre, Chandigarh, India.
Akriti KodesiaStructural Biology Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, G. N. Ramachandran Protein Centre, Chandigarh, India.
Nidhi KalidasCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, G. N. Ramachandran Protein Centre, Chandigarh, India.
AshishCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, G. N. Ramachandran Protein Centre, Chandigarh, India.
Krishan Gopal ThakurStructural Biology Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, G. N. Ramachandran Protein Centre, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: krishang@imtech.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The δ-proteobacteria Myxococcus xanthus displays social (S) and adventurous (A) motilities, which require pole-to-pole reversal of the motility regulator proteins. Mutual gliding motility protein C (MglC), a paralog of GTPase-activating protein Mutual gliding motility protein B (MglB), is a member of the polarity module involved in regulating motility. However, little is known about the structure and function of MglC. Here, we determined ∼1.85 Å resolution crystal structure of MglC using Selenomethionine Single-wavelength anomalous diffraction. The crystal structure revealed that, despite sharing <9% sequence identity, both MglB and MglC adopt a Regulatory Light Chain 7 family fold. However, MglC has a distinct ∼30° to 40° shift in the orientation of the functionally important α2 helix compared with other structural homologs. Using isothermal titration calorimetry and size-exclusion chromatography, we show that MglC binds MglB in 2:4 stoichiometry with submicromolar range dissociation constant. Using small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular docking studies, we show that the MglBC complex consists of a MglC homodimer sandwiched between two homodimers of MglB. A combination of size-exclusion chromatography and site-directed mutagenesis studies confirmed the MglBC interacting interface obtained by molecular docking studies. Finally, we show that the C-terminal region of MglB, crucial for binding its established partner MglA, is not required for binding MglC. These studies suggest that the MglB uses distinct interfaces to bind MglA and MglC. Based on these data, we propose a model suggesting a new role for MglC in polarity reversal in M. xanthus.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCell PolarityCloning, MolecularCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coliGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsKineticsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Motor ProteinsMutationMyxococcus xanthusProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandBacterial ProteinsMolecular Motor ProteinsProtein IsoformsRecombinant Proteinsbacterial motilitycell polarityisothermal calorimetryMglBMglCMyxococcus xanthuspolarity reversalprotein–protein interactionsRLC7 familySAXS

Identifiers

PMID33493516
PMCPMC7949163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.