Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33493429›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2021

Dynamic Public Perceptions of the Coronavirus Disease Crisis, the Netherlands, 2020.

Marion de Vries, Liesbeth Claassen, Margreet J M Te Wierik, Susan van den Hof, Anne E M Brabers, Judith D de Jong, Danielle R M Timmermans, Aura Timen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Physical Activity and COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marion de Vries
Liesbeth Claassen
Margreet J M Te Wierik
Susan van den Hof
Anne E M Brabers
Judith D de Jong
Danielle R M Timmermans
Aura Timen
Maastricht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key component of outbreak control is monitoring public perceptions and public response. To determine public perceptions and public responses during the first 3 months of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in the Netherlands, we conducted 6 repeated surveys of ≈3,000 persons. Generalized estimating equations analyses revealed changes over time as well as differences between groups at low and high risk. Overall, respondents perceived the risks associated with COVID-19 to be considerable, were positive about the mitigation measures, trusted the information and the measures from authorities, and adopted protective measures. Substantial increases were observed in risk perceptions and self-reported protective behavior in the first weeks of the outbreak. Individual differences were based mainly on participants' age and health condition. We recommend that authorities constantly adjust their COVID-19 communication and mitigation strategies to fit public perceptions and public responses and that they tailor the information for different groups.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Risk AssessmentRisk Reduction BehaviorSocial PerceptionAccess to InformationAdultAge FactorsAttitude to HealthFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleNetherlandsPublic HealthPublic Opinion2019 novel coronavirus diseaseattitudecommunicationcoronavirus diseaseCOVID-19disease outbreakshealth behaviorknowledgeperceptionrespiratory infectionsSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2the Netherlandstrustviruseszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID33493429
PMCPMC8007322
OpenAlexW3125038860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.