Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33492987›Full record

ReviewJCO oncology practice2021

Optimal Supportive Care for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer According to Their Disease Progression Phase.

Kumiko Kida, Ian Olver, Sriram Yennu, Debu Tripathy, Naoto T Ueno

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. "Ariadne's Thread": Psycho-educational Empowerment Intervention for Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  15. Psychosocial and supportive care concerns of young women living with advanced breast cancer: baseline findings from a prospective virtual support intervention study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Re-imagining metastatic breast cancer care delivery: a patient-partnered qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kumiko KidaDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-0946-5053
Ian OlverSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5478-1576
Sriram YennuDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2910-8141
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Naoto T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-0166-7275
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical progression patterns of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are heterogeneous; patients experience acute and stable phases at different time points. The acute phase consists of rapid progressive symptomatic changes, whereas in the stable phase, patients have relatively low symptom burden. Therefore, personalized interdisciplinary care is essential. The optimal palliative or supportive care in MBC is to provide comprehensive care that is individually prioritized to the patient's disease status. The purpose of this review is to provide a practical guide for oncologists to understand the priorities for supportive care for patients with MBC in the two phases. We note that for better decision making in patient care, performance status should be broadened to consider not only physical status but also psychosocial needs and cognitive condition. We summarize the clinical importance of physical symptom control, psychosocial support, physical activity, nutrition support, and advance care planning. For optimal care, we present palliative or supportive care checklists according to the disease progression phase, combining the limited evidence with expert input. In the acute phase, close monitoring of the patient's status and symptom management take priority. In the stable phase, the focus can shift to maintenance or improvement of physical strength and emotional condition. Finally, we discuss future directions and unmet needs in providing the best supportive care for patients with MBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOncologistsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansPalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID33492987
PMCPMC8258141
OpenAlexW3121495575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.