Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33492763›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

Treatment planning and outcomes effects of reducing the preferred mean esophagus dose for conventionally fractionated non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy.

Ellen D Yorke, Maria Thor, Daphna Y Gelblum, Daniel R Gomez, Andreas Rimner, Narek Shaverdian, Annemarie F Shepherd, Charles B Simone, Abraham Wu, Dominique McKnight and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ellen D YorkeDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Maria ThorDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Daphna Y GelblumDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Daniel R GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Andreas RimnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Narek ShaverdianDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Annemarie F ShepherdDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Charles B SimoneDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Abraham WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Dominique McKnightDepartment of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Andrew JacksonDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on an analysis of published literature, our department recently lowered the preferred mean esophagus dose (MED) constraint for conventionally fractionated (2 Gy/fraction in approximately 30 fractions) treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) with the goal of reducing the incidence of symptomatic acute esophagitis (AE). The goal of the change was to encourage treatment planners to achieve a MED close to 21 Gy while still permitting MED to go up to the previous guideline of 34 Gy in difficult cases. We compared all our suitable LA-NSCLC patients treated with plans from one year before through one year after the constraint change. The primary endpoint for this study was achievability of the new constraint by the planners; the secondary endpoint was reduction in symptomatic AE. Planners were able to achieve the new constraint in statistically significantly more cases during the year following its explicit implementation than in the year before (P = 0.0025). Furthermore, 38% of patients treated after the new constraint developed symptomatic AE during their treatment as opposed to 48% of the patients treated before. This is a clinically desirable endpoint although the observed difference was not statistically significant. A subsequent power calculation suggests that this is due to the relatively small number of patients in the study.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, ConformalEsophagusHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisteddose-volume constraintsnon-small cell lung cancernormal tissue complications probabilitytreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID33492763
PMCPMC7882106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.