Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33492706›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2021

Extensive impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pelvic floor dysfunctions care: A nationwide interdisciplinary survey.

Emilio Sacco, Carlo Gandi, Vincenzo Li Marzi, Gianfranco Lamberti, Maurizio Serati, Enrico Finazzi Agro', Marco Soligo, Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD)

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Implementing telemedicine in urogynecology: A feasibility study.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A complete year of urology residency training under COVID-19: impact on education and health.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emilio SaccoClinica Urologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4640-8354
Carlo GandiClinica Urologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Vincenzo Li MarziDepartment of Urology Clinic, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Gianfranco LambertiDepartment of Spinal Unit and Intensive Rehabilitation of the AUSL of Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3288-5275
Maurizio SeratiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-646X
Enrico Finazzi Agro'Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0308-8824
Marco SoligoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi - ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-3195
Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Piacenza · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health-care provision to patients suffering from pelvic floor dysfunctions in Italy.

methodsA retrospective web-based interdisciplinary survey was mailed by the Italian Society of Urodynamics to members involved in pelvic floor dysfunctions management from June 22, 2020 to July 17, 2020. The 84-item questionnaire investigated the period March-June 2020 (first epidemic wave) and showed high content validity. The primary outcome was the mean rate of cancellation for health-care services. Secondary outcomes included estimation of the accumulated surgeries backload until return to baseline activity and of the recovery pattern, using linear regression and scenario-based forecasting.

resultsA total of 85 participants provided complete responses. Respondents were mostly urologists (47%), followed by gynecologists (29.5%) and physiatrists (17.6%). On average, 78.4% of outpatient services and 82.7% of functional surgeries were canceled, without significant differences by geographical distribution. An impact on patients' quality of life was anticipated by most of the respondents (87%) and 48.2% also reported potentially serious health risks for patients. Thirty-three percent of the respondents reported the use of telemedicine. If the nation-wide surgical activity increases by 20% postpandemic, it would take 37 months to clear the backlog of functional surgeries. We acknowledge the inherent limitations of the survey methodology and retrospective design.

conclusionsAccess to care for patients suffering from pelvic floor dysfunctions has been dramatically affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. The indirect effects of this unprecedented disruption on pelvic floor dysfunctions care may last for several months.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElective Surgical ProceduresTime-to-TreatmentAdultAmbulatory CareCOVID-19FemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresGynecologyHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPelvic FloorPelvic Floor Disordersbenign prostatic hyperplasiachronic pelvic painCOVID-19 pandemiccystitisincontinenceoveractive bladderpelvic floor dysfunctionpelvic organ prolapseperineal fistula

Identifiers

PMID33492706
PMCPMC8013427
OpenAlexW3125364798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.