ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2021
The Acid-Dependent and Independent Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 on Clostridioides difficile R20291.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics: A Little Help for Enteral Nutritional Therapy in Critically Ill Adults.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Probiotic StrainMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The metabolites of lactic acid bacteria: classification, biosynthesis and modulation of gut microbiota.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) result from antibiotic use and cause severe diarrhea which is life threatening and costly. A specific probiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 has demonstrated a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of several nosocomial C. difficile strains by production of antimicrobial metabolites during fermentation. Though there are several lactobacilli shown to inhibit C. difficile growth by processes relying on acidification, this probiotic has demonstrated potency for CDI prevention among hospitalized patients. Here, we describe the acid-dependent and independent mechanisms by which these strains impair the cytotoxicity of a hypervirulent strain, C. difficile R20291 (CD). These bacteria were co-cultured in a series of experiments under anaerobic conditions in glucose-rich and no-sugar medium to inhibit or stimulate CD toxin production, respectively. In glucose-rich medium, there was low CD toxin production, but sufficient amounts to cause cytotoxic damage to human fibroblast cells. In co-culture, there was acidification by the lactobacilli resulting in growth inhibition as well as ≥ 99% reduced toxin A and B production and no observable cytotoxicity. In the absence of glucose, CD produced much more toxin. In co-culture, the lactobacilli did not acidify the medium and CD growth was unaffected; yet, the amount of detected toxin A and B was decreased by 20% and 41%, respectively. Despite the high concentration of toxin, cells exposed to the supernatant from the co-culture were able to survive. These results suggest that in addition to known acid-dependent effects, the combination of L. acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R, and L. rhamnosus CLR2 can interfere with CD pathogenesis without acidification: (1) reduced toxin A and B production and (2) toxin neutralization. This might explain the strain specificity of this probiotic in potently preventing C. difficile-associated diarrhea in antibiotic-treated patients compared with other probiotic formulae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.