Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33492570›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

Arsenic toxicity in livestock growing in arsenic endemic and control sites of West Bengal: risk for human and environment.

Antara Das, Madhurima Joardar, Nilanjana Roy Chowdhury, Ayan De, Deepanjan Mridha, Tarit Roychowdhury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antara DasSchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700070, India.
Madhurima JoardarSchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700070, India.
Nilanjana Roy ChowdhurySchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700070, India.
Ayan DeSchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700070, India.
Deepanjan MridhaSchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700070, India.
Tarit RoychowdhurySchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700070, India. rctarit@yahoo.com.
Jadavpur University · IN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Government of West Bengal research project grant Memo No. 262(Sanc.)/ST/P/S&T/1G-64/2017, dated 25/3/2018Jadavpur University Inter University Research Project, RUSA (R-11/1092/19, dated 06/08/2019)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to estimate geochemical arsenic toxicity in the domestic livestock and possible risk for human and environment caused by them. Daily dietary arsenic intake of an exposed adult cow or bull is nearly 4.56 times higher than control populace and about 3.65 times higher than exposed goats. Arsenic toxicity is well exhibited in all the biomarkers through different statistical interpretations. Arsenic bioconcentration is faster through water compared to paddy straw and mostly manifested in faeces and tail hair in cattle. Cow dung and tail hair are the most pronounced pathways of arsenic biotransformation into environment. A considerable amount of arsenic has been observed in animal proteins such as cow milk, boiled egg yolk, albumen, liver and meat from the exposed livestock. Cow milk arsenic is mostly accumulated in casein (83%) due to the presence of phosphoserine units. SAMOE-risk thermometer, calculated for the most regularly consumed foodstuffs in the area, shows the human health risk in a distinct order: drinking water > rice grain > cow milk > chicken > egg > mutton ranging from class 5 to 1. USEPA health risk assessment model reveals more risk in adults than in children, subsisting severe cancer risk from the foodstuffs where the edible animal proteins cannot be ignored. Therefore, the domestic livestock should be urgently treated with surface water, while provision of both arsenic-free drinking water and nutritional supplements is mandatory for the affected human population to overcome the severe arsenic crisis situation.

Indexed as

Arsenic PoisoningLivestockAnimalsArsenicCattleFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMilkWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomarkersBiotransformation factorConsumable animal productsDietary intakes of arsenicHuman health riskLivestock

Identifiers

PMID33492570
OpenAlexW3124526027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.