Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2021
Are urachal remnants really rare in children? An observational study.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ontogenetic Immaturity of Urachal Structures and Its Clinical Implications for Conservative Management in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic En-Bloc Excision of Urachal Sinus With Umbilical Ligament Complex in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- What should be investigated in delayed umbilical cord separation: Two case reports.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- [Draining umbilicus in adulthood?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Bladder prolapse through a patent urachus presenting as an umbilical mass in the newborn: characteristic prenatal sonographic findings and the diagnostic benefit of postnatal cystography.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urachal remnants are thought to have a low prevalence. However, recent studies indicate a higher rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of urachal remnants in children referred for imaging by abdominal/urinary/suprapubic ultrasonography in one calendar year. Files of children who underwent abdominal/urinary/suprapubic ultrasonography in one calendar year were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding children ≤17 years that underwent ultrasonography of the ventral abdominal wall while being assessed for various reasons were collected. Anomalies detected, age, gender, reason for ultrasonography request, and diagnosis of the urachal remnant were noted. All ultrasonography assessments were performed by a single pediatric radiologist in a single institution. There were 4836 patients in the study (1919 boys). Median age of the whole cohort was 7 years. A total of 10 patients were found to have urachal remnants, which included eight urachal cysts (three boys) and two urachal diverticula (one boy).Conclusion: The prevalence of urachal remnants in our cohort was nearly 2 in every 1000 children. More specifically, the prevalence of urachal cysts was one in 600. What is Known: • Urachal remnants were believed to be rare. • Recent studies indicated a higher incidence than previous reports. What is New: • This study shows that urachal remnant may be observed in one every 500 children that undergo ultrasonography of the abdomen for various reasons. • Parental counselling and management of urachal remnants should be planned accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.