Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33492438›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2021

A phase 1 trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor AR-42 in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2-associated tumors and advanced solid malignancies.

Katharine A Collier, Hugo Valencia, Herbert Newton, Erinn M Hade, Douglas W Sborov, Robert Cavaliere, Ming Poi, Mitch A Phelps, Sophia G Liva, Christopher C Coss and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01129193 (Phase I Study of AR-42 in Relapsed Myeloma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, and Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01129193 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Study of AR-42 in Relapsed Myeloma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, and Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmir MortazaviRan2010 to 2017Enrolled44ConditionsAdult Nasal Type Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma, Cutaneous B-cell Non-Hodgkin LymphomaArmsPharmacodynamic Studies, Fatigue Inventory, Pharmacogenomic studies, AR-42
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Mechanisms of HDACs in cancer development.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. New Insights into the LANCL2-Pharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine A CollierDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-8031
Hugo ValenciaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Herbert NewtonDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-7568
Erinn M HadeCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-6443
Douglas W SborovDivision of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-2698
Robert CavaliereDivision Neuro-Oncology, Department of Cancer Medicine, Baptist MD Anderson, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ming PoiCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-8662
Mitch A PhelpsCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1615-5280
Sophia G LivaCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-5001
Christopher C CossCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-9190
Jiang WangCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Soun KhounthamDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Paul MonkDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0508-2987
Charles L ShapiroDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Richard PiekarzNational Cancer Institute/Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-7893
Craig C HofmeisterDivision of Hematology, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-1607
D Bradley WellingDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9963-469X
Amir MortazaviDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Amir.Mortazavi@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-6805
The Ohio State University · USEmory University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

UM1 Supplement for Early Therapeutic Trials with Phase 2 IntentUM1CA186712 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSANNE M ARNOLD, WILLIAM E. CARSON · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
PHASE I TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA076576 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREVER, MICHAEL R · 1998 to 2013
$9.1M
Overcoming IMiD resistance in MyelomaR01CA201382 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOFMEISTER, CRAIG C., PHELPS, MITCH A · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
Training Hematology and Oncology Fellows in Clinical ResearchT32CA247815 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VERSCHRAEGEN, CLAIRE F., WESOLOWSKI, ROBERT · 2020 to 2024
$862k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201382NCI NIH HHS T32 CA247815NCI NIH HHS U01 CA076576NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven clinical activity of AR-42, an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, in hematologic malignancies and preclinical activity in solid tumors, this phase 1 trial investigated the safety and tolerability of AR-42 in patients with advanced solid tumors, including neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas and schwannomas (NF2). The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives included determining pharmacokinetics and clinical activity.

methodsThis phase I trial was an open-label, single-center, dose-escalation study of single-agent AR-42 in primary central nervous system and advanced solid tumors. The study followed a 3 + 3 design with an expansion cohort at the MTD.

resultsSeventeen patients were enrolled with NF2 (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), breast cancer (n = 2), non-NF2-related meningioma (n = 2), carcinoma of unknown primary (n = 2), small cell lung cancer (n = 1), Sertoli cell carcinoma (n = 1), and uveal melanoma (n = 1). The recommended phase II dose is 60 mg three times weekly, for 3 weeks of a 28-day cycle. DLTs included grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 psychosis. The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytopenias, fatigue, and nausea. The best response was stable disease in 53% of patients (95% CI 26.6-78.7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI 1.2-9.1). Among evaluable patients with NF2 or meningioma (n = 5), median PFS was 9.1 months (95% CI 1.9-not reached).

conclusionSingle-agent AR-42 is safe and well tolerated. Further studies may consider AR-42 in a larger cohort of patients with NF2 or in combination with other agents in advanced solid tumors.

trial registrationNCT01129193, registered 5/24/2010.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeurofibromatosis 2PhenylbutyratesYoung AdultHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsOSU-HDAC42 compoundPhenylbutyratesHistone deacetylase inhibitorNeurofibromatosis type 2PharmacokineticsPhase 1Solid tumor

Identifiers

PMID33492438
PMCPMC8162746
OpenAlexW3121920478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.