Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33492374›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2021

Effect of Text Messaging on Bowel Preparation and Appointment Attendance for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nadim Mahmud, David A Asch, Jessica Sung, Catherine Reitz, Mary S Coniglio, Caitlin McDonald, Donna Bernard, Shivan J Mehta

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03710213 nacompletednot on this map

Automated Text Message Navigation to Improve Outpatient Colonoscopy Show Rate and Bowel Preparation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled752ConditionsAdherence, Patient, Colonoscopy, Text MessagingArmsText Message-based Intervention
NCT06159855 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Bowel Preparation Training Given to Patients Planned to Undergo Colonoscopy and the Monitoring Carried Out by the Nurse on Anxiety, Compliance With Bowel Preparation and Bowel Cleansing

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsColonoscopyArmsIntervention group: nurse-led education for bowel preparation of colonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Green endoscopy: A review of strategies for sustainable practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. An algorithm-based active cleansing protocol can reduce the bowel preparation time for screening colonoscopy: A propensity score matching study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadim MahmudDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
David A AschCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jessica SungDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Catherine ReitzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Mary S ConiglioDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Caitlin McDonaldDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Donna BernardDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Shivan J MehtaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Behavioral Economics and Population-based Colorectal Cancer ScreeningK08CA234326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEHTA, SHIVAN JATIN · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Outpatient colonoscopy is important for colorectal cancer screening. However, nonadherence and poor bowel preparation are common. Objective: To determine if an automated text messaging intervention with a focus on informational and reminder functions could improve attendance rates and bowel preparation quality for outpatient colonoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in an endoscopy center at an urban academic medical center. Adult patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy between January and September 2019 were enrolled by telephone call (early phase) or by automated text message (late phase). Data were analyzed from October 2019 to January 2020. Interventions: After enrollment, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to usual care (ie, written instructions and nurse telephone call) or to the intervention (ie, usual care plus an automated series of 9 educational or reminder text messages in the week prior to scheduled colonoscopy). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was appointment attendance rate with good or excellent bowel preparation. Secondary outcomes included appointment attendance rate, bowel preparation quality (poor or inadequate, fair or adequate, and good or excellent), and cancellation lead time (in days). Results: Among 753 patients included and randomized in the trial (median [interquartile range] age, 56 [49-64] years; 364 [48.3%] men; 429 [57.2%] Black), 367 patients were randomized to the intervention group and 386 patients were randomized to the control group. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups (patients attending appointments with good or excellent bowel preparation: intervention, 195 patients [53.1%]; control, 210 patients [54.4%]; P = .73), including when stratified by early or late phase enrollment groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found no significant difference in appointment attendance or bowel preparation quality with an automated text messaging intervention compared with the usual care control. Future work could optimize the content and delivery of text message interventions or identify patient subgroups that may benefit from this approach. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03710213.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAppointments and SchedulesColonoscopyPatient ComplianceText MessagingCatharticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReminder SystemsCathartics

Identifiers

PMID33492374
PMCPMC7835713
OpenAlexW3122285315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.