Observational studyJAMA network open2021
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- After ACL Injury in Children and Adolescents, Where in the Preoperative Timeline do Disparities in Timing and Clinical Course Originate?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2026Article
- Equity in Neurotoxicity Care in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.Seminars in neurology · 2026Article
- Upstream Factors Associated With Hospitalization in Black- and Minority-Serving Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Disparities in patient experience with video and audio-only virtual care.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2026Article
- Article
- Disparities in quality of life and health literacy among patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: the influence of racial and ethnic factors in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of neurosurgery. Spine · 2026Article
- Differences in immunoglobulin utilization when treating patients with primary immune disease in the United States.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- National race-based disparities in referral to Commission on Cancer centers for lung cancer resection.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Article
- Provider effects and racial inequities in breast cancer risk-management adoption: Findings from a community-based study of high-risk women.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- United against racism: enhancing access and patient experience for black and Hispanic patients in Neuro-oncological care.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Referrals and Black-White Coronary Heart Disease Treatment Disparities: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physician Perspectives.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Age, comorbidity, race and gender differences in referral to a pulmonologist among patients with sarcoidosis at a large academic medical center.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Racial disparities in pediatric spinal fusion surgery affect perioperative outcomes: a national multicenter study.Spine deformity · 2025Article
- Delays in Referral to Multidisciplinary Care for Black Individuals With Sarcoidosis.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on Delayed Specialty Follow-Up After a Primary Care Visit.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Patient Photograph Association With Radiologist Recommendations for Additional Imaging.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025Observational
- Racial and ethnic disparities in sublingual immunotherapy prescriptions for allergic rhinitis in the United States.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Disparities in quality of care according to patient race and socioeconomic status persist in the US. Differential referral patterns to specialist physicians might be associated with observed disparities. Objective: To examine whether differences exist between Black and White Medicare beneficiaries in the observed patterns of patient sharing between primary care physicians (PCPs) and physicians in the 6 specialties to which patients were most frequently referred. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional observational study of Black and White Medicare beneficiaries used claims data from 2009 to 2010 on 100% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries who were seen by PCPs and selected high-volume specialists in 12 health care markets with at least 10% of the population being Black. Statistical analyses were conducted from December 20, 2017, to September 30, 2020. Exposures: Differences in patterns of patient sharing among Black and White patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary care physician and specialist degree (the number of other PCPs or specialists to whom each physician is connected) and strength (the number of shared patients per connection, overall, for Black patients and White patients and after equalizing the numbers of Black and White patients per PCP), as well as distance between PCP and patient and specialist zip code centroids. Results: The 12 selected markets ranged in size from Manhattan, New York (187 054 Black or White beneficiaries seen by at least 2 physicians within an episode of care; 9794 total physicians), to Tallahassee, Florida (44 644 Black or White beneficiaries seen by at least 2 physicians within an episode of care; 847 total physicians). The percentage of Black beneficiaries ranged from 11.5% (Huntsville, Alabama) to 46.8% (Chicago, Illinois). The mean PCP-specialist degree (number of specialists with whom a PCP shares patients) was lower for Black patients than for White patients. For instance, the mean PCP-cardiologist degree across all markets for White patients was 17.5 compared with 8.8 for Black patients. After sampling White patients to equalize the numbers of patients seen, the degree differences narrowed but were still not equivalent in many markets (eg, for all specialties in Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 4.5 for Black patients vs 5.7 for White patients). Specialist networks among White patients were much larger than those constructed based just on Black patients (eg, for cardiology across all markets: 135 for Black patients vs 330 for White patients), even after equalizing the numbers of patients seen per PCP (123 for Black patients vs 211 for White patients). The overall test for differences in referral patterns was statistically significant for all 6 specialties examined in 7 of the 12 markets and in 5 specialties for another 3. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that differences exist in specialist referral patterns by race among Medicare beneficiaries. This is an observational study, and thus some differences might have resulted from patient-initiated visits to specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.