Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33491225›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2021

Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.

Daniel R Matute, Brandon S Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic analyses inEvolution letters · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. When islands collide: Divergence predicts outcomes of secondary contact during the fusion of Sulawesi's paleo-archipelago.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A species interaction kick-starts ecological speciation in allopatry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel R MatuteBiology Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27510.
Brandon S CooperDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812.

Funding

The evolutionary genetics and genomics of Wolbachia effects on host physiologyR35GM124701 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI Brandon S. Cooper · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
The prevalence of genetic introgression in speciationR01GM121750 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MATUTE, DANIEL · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121750NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the processes of population divergence and speciation remains a core question in evolutionary biology. For nearly a hundred years evolutionary geneticists have characterized reproductive isolation (RI) mechanisms and specific barriers to gene flow required for species formation. The seminal work of Coyne and Orr provided the first comprehensive comparative analysis of speciation. By combining phylogenetic hypotheses and species range data with estimates of genetic divergence and multiple mechanisms of RI across Drosophila, Coyne and Orr's influential meta-analyses answered fundamental questions and motivated new analyses that continue to push the field forward today. Now 30 years later, we revisit the five questions addressed by Coyne and Orr, identifying results that remain well supported and others that seem less robust with new data. We then consider the future of speciation research, with emphasis on areas where novel methods and data motivate potential progress. While the literature remains biased towards Drosophila and other model systems, we are enthusiastic about the future of the field.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationModels, BiologicalAnimalsDrosophilaGene FlowPhylogenyReproductive IsolationHaldane's rulePostyzygotic isolationSpeciation

Identifiers

PMID33491225
PMCPMC8247902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.