ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2022
Retained Endoscope: An Unexpected but Serious Complication of Hemospray®.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemostatic Hold-Up: A Rare Case of Endoscopic Retention After Hemostatic Powder Application.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Visceral Perforation Following Hemostatic Powder TC-325 Application in a Patient With Gastric Cancer: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Post-polypectomy colorectal bleeding: current strategies and the way forward.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Don't Look Back and Spray! Risk of Endoscope Adhesion with Hemospray Application in Retroflexion in a Pediatric Patient.JPGN reports · 2023Article
- Hemostatic powders for gastrointestinal bleeding: a review of old, new, and emerging agents in a rapidly advancing field.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- [Hemostatic Role of TC-325 in Tumor-Related Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Experience in a Tertiary Care Centre].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33491164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.