ArticleClinical neuroradiology2021
Torsional Characterization of Braided Flow Diverter Stents : A New Method to Evaluate Twisting Phenomenon.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of flow diverters versus stent-assisted coiling in unruptured anterior circulation bifurcation aneurysms: a two-center, propensity score matched study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Recanalization of a chronic occlusion flow-diverter device in a patient with a paraclinoid giant aneurysm recurrence. Clinical observation.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn the interventional treatment of cerebral aneurysms, flow diverter (FD) stents have played a significant role for more than a decade. Many studies have shown good aneurysm occlusion rates and low complication profiles. However, feared complications include acute thrombotic vessel occlusion due to stenotic deformation of the FD during release, the so-called twisting. This work investigates the behavior of different stent types to causative torsion forces in a mechanical model. MATERIALS AND
methodsTorsion characterization equipment was custom built, and two different FD stents (Derivo, Acandis and P64, Phenox) with n = 3 were tested. One end of the FD was fixed while the other end was twisted while measuring the torsion force.
resultsIn torsional force vs. the twisting angle graph, a very sharp decrease and increase in force was recorded when the stent collapsed or reopened, respectively, making it possible to characterize for twisting. All six devices showed partial/complete collapse on torsion and showed significant delayed reopening on untwisting. Interestingly on repeated testing, the stent collapsed at earlier angles, probably due to microscopic material defects. Slight variations between stents of the same type suggest that more extensive data sets are needed.
conclusionsWe report a new method to characterize torsion for braided FD stents, which is reliable and reproducible. Additionally, the delayed reopening and the tendency to collapse at earlier angles on consequent testing maneuvers can be significant for clinical usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33491133What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.