Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33490858›Full record

ArticleAllergologie select2021

Benefits and limitations of sting challenge in hymenoptera venom allergy.

Katharina Aßmus, Markus Meissner, Roland Kaufmann, Eva Maria Valesky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergologie select, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy in Dogs: Safety and Clinical Efficacy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Cells · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharina AßmusDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Markus MeissnerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Roland KaufmannDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Eva Maria ValeskyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of systemic reactions to hymenoptera stings is up to 7.5%. Venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT) is an established treatment for insect venom allergy. In order to monitor the allergic status and thus the success of the therapy, controlled sting challenge under VIT continues to be the gold standard. This review deals not only with useful indications and therapeutic consequences but also with critical aspects that should be considered when performing sting challenge.

Indexed as

hymenoptera venom allergyrisk factorssting challengetherapy failure

Identifiers

PMID33490858
PMCPMC7814776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.