Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33490153›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Xi Zhong, Qin Wu, Hao Yang, Wei Dong, Bo Wang, Zhongwei Zhang, Guopeng Liang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06755320 (Comparative Study Between Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06755320 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDSArmsmechanical ventilation (MV)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xi ZhongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qin WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei DongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bo WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhongwei ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guopeng LiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ARDS ventilator therapy with APRV or LTVV were identified using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and The Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) from inception to March 2019.

resultsA total of 7 RCTs with a 405 patients were eligible for our meta-analysis. The results revealed that APRV was associated with lower hospital mortality [405 patients; odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.88; P=0.01], a shorter time of ventilator therapy [373 patients; mean difference (MD), 5.36; 95% CI, 1.99-8.73; P=0.002], and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (315 patients; MD, -4.50; 95% CI, -6.56 to -2.44; P<0.0001), better respiratory system compliance on day 3 (202 patients; MD, 8.19; 95% CI, 0.84-15.54; P=0.03), arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (294 patients; MD, 44.40; 95% CI, 16.05-72.76; P=0.002), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day 3 (285 patients; MD, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.10-5.25; P<0.00001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pneumothorax (170 patients; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12-1.34; P=0.14).

conclusionsThe meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce hospital mortality, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, improve lung compliance, oxygenation index, and MAP compared with LTVV for patients with ARDS. We found APRV to be a safe and effective ventilation mode for patients with ARDS.

Indexed as

acute lung injuryAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)airway pressure release ventilation (APRV)low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV)

Identifiers

PMID33490153
PMCPMC7812231
OpenAlexW3118213925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.