ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Exploring the Optimal Chemotherapy Strategy for Locoregionally Advanced Children and Adolescent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Level in the Era of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Pediatric Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC).Current oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aimed to explore the optimal chemotherapy strategy for locoregionally advanced children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LcaNPC), based on the level of pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA (pEBV-DNA) in the era of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
methodsThis real-world, retrospective study consecutively reviewed locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients younger than 22 years old from 2006 to 2016 in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and the Cox regression model were used to investigate the survival outcomes of different chemotherapy intensities and pEBV-DNA. Treatment-related toxicity was also evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test.
resultsA total of 179 patients were enrolled, including 86 patients in the high-risk group (pEBV-DNA ≥7,500 copies/ml) and 93 patients in the low-risk group (pEBV-DNA <7,500 copies/ml). Among all patients, those receiving low intensity induction chemotherapy (IC courses = 2) had a better 5-year overall survival (OS) than those receiving no IC (P = 0.025) and high intensity IC (IC courses >2) (P = 0.044). In the high-risk group, receipt of low intensity IC showed significant 5-year OS (P = 0.032), progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.027), and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (P = 0.008) benefits compared with not receiving IC. Multivariate analyses identified that not receiving IC was a risk factor compared with low intensity IC for OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 10.933, P = 0.038) among all patients. Moreover, in the high-risk group, not receiving IC was a risk factor for 5-year OS (HR = 10.878, P = 0.038), 5-year PFS (HR = 5.705, P = 0.041), and 5-year DMFS (HR = 10.290, P = 0.040) compared to low intensity IC. There were no differences in survival for patients treated with or without concurrent chemotherapy.
conclusionTwo courses of platinum-based IC might be the optimal induction chemotherapy intensity to reduce risk of death, progression, and distant metastasis in patients with high pEBV-DNA levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.