Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Jeea Lee, Hyung Seok Park, Haemin Lee, Dong Won Lee, Seung Yong Song, Dae Hyun Lew, Jee Ye Kim, Seho Park, Seung Il Kim

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeea LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyung Seok ParkDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Haemin LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Won LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung Yong SongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dae Hyun LewDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jee Ye KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seho ParkDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study is to directly compare surgical outcomes between conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (CNSM) and robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM). MATERIALS AND

methodFor this case-control study, 369 cases of 333 patients who underwent CNSM or RNSM with immediate reconstruction between November 2016 and January 2019 at Severance Hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea were reviewed. Patients with stage IV breast cancer (n = 1), receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 43), or subjected to previous operations (n = 14) or radiotherapy on the breasts were excluded. The main outcomes were comparing rates of post-operative complications, of high-grade post-operative complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification, and nipple necrosis between the CNSM and the RNSM groups.

resultsA total of 311 cases, including 270 CNSMs and 41 RNSMs, were analyzed. The rates of post-operative nipple necrosis (

conclusionRNSM was associated with lower rates of high-grade post-operative complications and nipple necrosis than CNSM for patients with small breast volumes and less ptotic breasts.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmsminimal invasive surgerynipple necrosisnipple-sparing mastectomyrobotic mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID33489893
PMCPMC7819886
OpenAlexW3119850215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.