Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489886›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Treatment Options of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Subsequent Systemic Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced EGFR Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: Implications From Taiwan Cancer Registry Cohort.

Sheng-Kai Liang, Li-Ta Keng, Chia-Hao Chang, Yueh-Feng Wen, Meng-Rui Lee, Ching-Yao Yang, Jann-Yuan Wang, Jen-Chung Ko, Jin-Yuan Shih, Chong-Jen Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng-Kai LiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Li-Ta KengDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Chia-Hao ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Yueh-Feng WenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Meng-Rui LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Ching-Yao YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jann-Yuan WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jen-Chung KoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Jin-Yuan ShihDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chong-Jen YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Tsing Hua University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLarge-scale, population-based real-world studies on the treatment outcomes of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and subsequent systemic chemotherapy agents for lung adenocarcinoma (with activating epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutations) remain limited. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom March 2014 to December 2016, patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry were included in this study if they received any of the three TKIs as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD).

resultsA total of 4,889 patients (median age: 67 years and two-thirds with distant metastasis) were recruited (1,778 gefitinib, 1,599 erlotinib, and 1,512 afatinib users). A 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts of 1,228 afatinib/erlotinib and 1054 afatinib/gefitinib was created. After PS matching, it was found that afatinib was not associated with better OS (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86-1.07; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, afatinib demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with active smoking (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94) and ECOG > 1 (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98). A total of 41.1% (n = 1992) of first-line TKI users received subsequent chemotherapy. Among the three TKI groups, pemetrexed usage was associated with better OS compared with other chemotherapy agents, with the exception of gemcitabine in the afatinib and gefitinib groups. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine had the longest TTD of 3-4 months.

conclusionsAmong patients with

Indexed as

afatinibepidermal growth factor receptor mutationerlotinibgefitiniblung adenocarcinomasubsequent therapy

Identifiers

PMID33489886
PMCPMC7821751
OpenAlexW3120155391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.