Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489732›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular echography2020

Echocardiography and Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID-19 Patients.

Alberto Cresti, Agata Barchitta, Andrea Barbieri, Ines Paola Monte, Giuseppe Trocino, Quirino Ciampi, Sofia Miceli, Licia Petrella, Emilija Jaric, Marco Solari and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular echography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transthoracic Echocardiography-Based Prediction Model of Adverse Event Risk in Patients with COVID-19.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alberto CrestiDepartment of Cardioneurovascular Diseases, Misericordia Hospital, Italy.
Agata BarchittaSub Intensive Care Unit, San Antonio Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Andrea BarbieriCardiology, AOU of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Ines Paola MonteCardiology, AOU Policlinic, University of Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe TrocinoCardiology, Hospital of Desio (MB), Desio, Italy.
Quirino CiampiCardiology, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Sofia MiceliGeriatrics, AOU Mater-Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
Licia PetrellaCardiology, "Mazzini" Hospital, Teramo, Italy.
Emilija JaricIntensive Care Unit, Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marco SolariDepartment of Cardioneurovascular Diseases, Misericordia Hospital, Italy.
Cristina BassoCardiovascular Pathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Mauro PepiMonzino Cardiology Center, IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Francesco Antonini-CanterinRehabilitative Cardiology, Ospedale Riabilitativo di Alta Specializzazione di Motta di Livenza (TV), Treviso, Veneto, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic caused by the new SARS-CoV-2, named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, has challenged the health-care systems and raised new diagnostic pathways and safety issues for cardiac imagers. Myocardial injury may complicate COVID-19 infection in more than a quarter of patients and due to the wide a range of possible insults, cardiac imaging plays a crucial diagnostic and prognostic role. There is still little evidence regarding the best-imaging pathway and the echocardiographic findings. Most of the data derive from the single centers experiences and case-reports; therefore, our review reflects the recommendations mainly based on expert opinion. Moreover, knowledge is constantly evolving. The health-care system and physicians are called to reorganize the diagnostic pathways to minimize the possibility of spreading the infection. Thus a rapid, bedside, ultrasound assessment of the heart, chest, and leg veins by point-of-care ultrasound seems to be the first-line tool of the fight against the SARS-CoV-2. A second Level of cardiac imaging is appropriate when the result may guide decision-making or may be life-saving. Dedicated scanners should be used and special pathways should be reserved for these patients. The current knowledge on cardiac imaging COVID-19 patients is reviewed.

Indexed as

COVID-19echocardiographyimagingmultimodalitypandemicSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33489732
PMCPMC7811699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.