ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021
Who are the individuals with the worst perceived quality of sleep? A population-based survey in southern Brazil.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- U-shaped association between sleep duration and the risk of respiratory diseases mortality: a large prospective cohort study from UK Biobank.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023Article
- Protocol for single case experimental design for yoga and sleep quality and inflammation: A two-hit model of sleep intervention.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with poorer sleep quality. It consisted of a population-based cross-sectional study conducted in Southern Brazil with individuals aged 18 years or older. Participants were selected through a two-stage random sampling strategy and data collection was conducted in 2016. The outcome was self-perceived quality of sleep. Questions regarding the number of hours of sleep and the use of medicines to sleep each week were also asked. Demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral and health conditions were collected through questionnaire. The study sample was composed of 1,300 individuals whose mean age was 46.1 years (SD = 17.3). The prevalence of poor sleep quality was 10.7% (95% CI 9.3% to 12.1%). The poorer the quality of sleep was, the higher the prevalence of the use of medicines to sleep (22.3% versus 10.0% in the overall sample; p < 0.001) and the lower the average amount of daily sleep (6.0 h/day versus 7.3 h/day in the overall sample; p < 0.001). Groups with the worst quality of sleep, in the adjusted analyses, were female (p = 0.012), younger (18 to 39 years versus 60 years or more) (p = 0.048), with poorer perceived diet (p < 0.001), most stressed (p < 0.001), with chronic back pain (p = 0.002), with chronic respiratory disease (p = 0.012), with worse quality of life (p = 0.018) and depression (p = 0.034). Concluding, one out of ten individuals reported poor sleep quality. The results suggest that lifestyle changes could improve the quality of sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.