Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489636›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Information Needs in Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention: Validation and Reliability Analysis of NPCI-10 Item Scale.

Vasiliki Tsoulou, Georgios Vasilopoulos, Theodoros Kapadohos, George Panoutsopoulos, Antonia Kalogianni, Georgia Toulia, Ioannis Koutelekos, Georgia Gerogianni, Maria Polikandrioti

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07701109 (The Effect of Individualized Discharge Education on Readmission Rates in a High-Risk Population According to the LACE Index After Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07701109 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Individualized Discharge Education on Readmission Rates in a High-Risk Population According to the LACE Index After Myocardial Infarction

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdiyaman Provincial Health DirectorateRan2026 to 2027Enrolled82ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsIndividualized discharge education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vasiliki TsoulouNursing, General Hospital Asklipieio Voulas, Athens, GRC.
Georgios VasilopoulosDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Theodoros KapadohosDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
George PanoutsopoulosDepartment of Nursing, University of Peloponnese, Sparta, GRC.
Antonia KalogianniDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Georgia TouliaDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Ioannis KoutelekosDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Georgia GerogianniDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Maria PolikandriotiDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a nonsurgical procedure used in the treatment of coronary heart disease. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to validate a scale created in order to assess the importance and fulfillment of information needs in patients after PCI.

methodsA 10-item scale was created by the researchers to explore the level of information needs and the level of fulfillment of these needs. The total scores have a possible range of 10 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher importance and fulfillment. The validation of the questionnaire included face and content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, repeatability, and discriminant validity.

resultsForty patients contributed to this validation. Mean and median scores for each question separately and also overall scores suggest that patients consider the need to be informed very important and that it was fulfilled to a very high degree (mean scores 39.5 and 39.3, respectively). All questions were found to be significantly correlated with the overall scores (rho > 0.3) meaning strong construct validity. Cronbach's α coefficients were high (>0.7) indicating great consistency. Both total scores had great repeatability, which suggests a high degree of reliability of the participants' responses (ICCs > 0.8). Regarding discriminant validity, a statistically significant association was observed only between marital status and the degree of fulfillment of the need to be informed (p = 0.036). More specifically, divorced or widowed patients had a lower degree of fulfillment than married patients (mean 38.6 vs. 39.6).

conclusionIt is a reliable instrument that will help clinicians who are at close contact with patients after PCI to gain a better understanding of their needs.

Indexed as

heart failurepatient needsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33489636
PMCPMC7813540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.