ArticleCureus2020
Risk Assessment of Patients After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Killip Classification: An Institutional Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The impact of emergency quality improvement program on the prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic utility of Killip classification in acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort analysis in contemporary clinical practice.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- The Correlation Between Triglyceride-Glucose Index (TyG Index) With the Severity of Acute New-Onset Heart Failure (NOHF) Complications in Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Killip Classification.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- A nomogram for predicting intraoperative risk during primary percutaneous coronary intervention based on rapidly obtained data from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Arrhythmia in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Early Left Ventricular Function After STEMI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Changes in Weight, Waist Circumference or Both With Incident Heart Failure in Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
- Impact of Pre-PCI Activated Clotting Time on Outcomes of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During Primary PCI.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Behavior of Complement System Effectors in Chronic and Acute Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Impact of Epicardial Adipose Tissue on Infarct Size and Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In-Hospital Mortality Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Tertiary Academic Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- An exploration of the early discharge approach for low-risk STEMI patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2023Review
- Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With or Without Mitral Regurgitation.Cureus · 2022Article
- Predicting Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Role of the Quick Forrester Classification.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The Killip classification system was introduced for clinical assessment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). It stratifies individuals according to the severity of their post-MI heart failure. This system provides effective stratification of long-term and short-term outcomes in patients with acute MI and influences the treatment strategies. Revalidation of Killip class in our local population is mandatory. We planned this study to increase cardiologist's readiness to tackle the risks associated with increased mortality in each class post ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Objectives were to determine the frequency of Killip classes I, II, III, and IV and in-hospital mortality in each Killip class in patients with left ventricular failure secondary to STEMI. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, over a period of three years. Patients with STEMI were stratified using Killip classification, and validation was performed by determining the within 15 days in-hospital mortality in each Killip class. Results The frequency (percentage) of patients with STEMI in each Killip class from I to IV was 395 (81.4%), 46 (9.5%), 27 (5.6%), and 17 (3.5%), respectively, while the in-hospital mortality in each Killip class came out to be 39 (9.9%), 4 (8.7%), 25 (92.6%) and 17 (100%), respectively. The presence of diabetes, history of smoking, and body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.