ReviewCureus2020
Quality Improvement Focused Morbidity and Mortality Rounds: An Integrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Things Go Wrong: A Guide to the Medical, Ethical, and Legal Dimensions of Surgical Complications.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024Review
- Enhancing patient safety: a system-based analysis of morbidity and mortality conferences in managing postoperative bleeding following gastric and pancreatic cancer surgery.BMJ open quality · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the implementation of a quality improvement program through morbidity and mortality reviews in a developing country.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Two-Year Profile of Preventable Errors in Hospital-Based Neurology.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Neurology Morbidity and Mortality Conferences and Quality Improvement: Single-Center Experience and National Survey.The Neurohospitalist · 2022Article
- Parent Participation in Morbidity and Mortality Review: Parent and Physician Perspectives.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- A Survey-Based Assessment of the Practices Governing Morbidity and Mortality Conferences and the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Interprofessional Clinical Learning Environment for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety From Perspectives of Interprofessional Teams.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
- Implementation status of morbidity and mortality conferences in Austrian hospitals-A cross-sectional national survey study.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morbidity and mortality conference (MMC) is a century-old tradition in medicine that was initially primarily focused on the review of surgical outcomes and errors. In recent years, the value of MMC in quality improvement (QI) and patient safety initiatives has been realized and incorporated into the MMCs of some disciplines and institutions. Despite this, there is a need for a standardized structure of MMC that emphasizes both QI and patient safety. The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesize the literature on MMC structure that is reflective of QI and patient safety. An integrative literature search was carried out using PubMed and MEDLINE. Abstracts were reviewed and non-relevant articles were excluded. Exclusion criteria were no mention of MMC, analysis of specific case, no focus on QI or patient safety, and non-English language. A total of 21 articles were identified for review. Articles were reviewed in their entirety for content regarding structuring of the MMC to reflect and further develop QI and patient safety. The follwing three themes emerged that were consistently identified as being important for restructuring MMCs: (1) the importance of careful case selection, (2) the format of discussion during the conferences, and (3) the action plans reflecting QI initiatives derived from the conferences. The review suggests that one standardized method of MMC implementation that encompasses the three pivotal themes should be developed. Further research needs to focus on instituting measures of effectiveness for the new MMC model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.