ReviewCureus2020
Role, Effectiveness, and Outcome of Decompressive Craniectomy for Cerebral Venous and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (CVST): Is Surgery Really an Option?
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a family with protein S deficiency: genetic analysis and phenotypic characterization.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- New recommendations on cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis from the German consensus-based (S2k) guideline.Neurological research and practice · 2024Article
- Efficiency of decompressive craniectomy as a line of management of severe cerebral venous thrombosis.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Thrombocytopenia and Intracranial Venous Sinus Thrombosis after "COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca" Exposure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Values of Coagulation Factors X, XI, and XII in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis During Perinatal State.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis (CVST) is predominantly a disease of young people. It accounts for 0.5% of all strokes, and patients usually have good outcomes. However, a minority of patients may present with elevated intracranial pressure characteristics in a serious illness type and may die from brain herniation if not treated promptly. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the only treatment modality that can prevent death in such cases of imminent brain herniation. Unfortunately, due to the condition's rarity and ethical concerns, randomized controlled trials are not available. This review assessed the available literature on cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis in different age groups and decompressive craniectomy in cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis. It revealed that decompressive surgery is extremely effective when done early and for the correct indications with patients achieving excellent functional outcomes post-surgery. Decompressive surgery is recommended in rapidly deteriorating patients with computed tomography (CT) scan evidence of basal cisterns effacement, a mass effect from haemorrhage and/or infarction, and significant midline shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.