Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489531›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

COVID-19 and Obstetrical Care: Coping With New Stress.

Ritu Sharma, Shikha Seth, Hariom K Solanki, Neha Mishra, Anurag Srivastava, Kiran Jakhar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research.Current research in ecological and social psychology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence of Stress and Insomnia among Health Care Workers in India during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ritu SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, IND.
Shikha SethDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, IND.
Hariom K SolankiDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, IND.
Neha MishraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Goverment Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, IND.
Anurag SrivastavaDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, IND.
Kiran JakharDepartment of Psychiatry, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGovernment of Uttar Pradesh · INGovernment Medical College · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Our study aimed to assess the mental health outcomes and coping strategies among healthcare workers (HCWs) in an already over-burdened maternity ward and labour room during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods This cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted using Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA), which included demographic characteristics, perceived stressors, and validated scales: the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21), Insomnia Severity Index, and the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE) scale. The results were evaluated and compared among COVID-19 caregivers and other HCWs. Results A total of 184 participants were included in the study, out of which 112 (60.9%) were COVID-19 caregivers. Overall, HCWs managing COVID-19 patients experienced significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. They often adopted an avoidant coping style (p-value: 0.006). The results of binary logistic regression analysis revealed that living with family and perceiving multiple stressors appeared to be associated with increased risk of anxiety while being a COVID-19 caregiver and appeared to be a risk factor for stress. Avoidant coping was found to be associated with insomnia while approach coping was less associated with anxiety. The most prevalent stressor among HCWs at our institute was distancing from family and friends (62%) followed by fear of getting infected (51.1%). Compared to other HCWs, the stressors perceived in significantly higher proportion by COVID-19 caregivers included distancing from family and friends (p-value: 0.003), scarcity of workforce (p-value: 0.005), and dealing with non-cooperative patients (p-value: <0.001). Conclusion We would request the immediate attention of the concerned authorities to implement interventions to buffer the impact of COVID-19 in the already stressed-out maternity wards and labour rooms.

Indexed as

coping strategiescovid 19 pandemicmental health outcomesobstetrical carestressors

Identifiers

PMID33489531
PMCPMC7808962
OpenAlexW3112695315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.