ArticleAmerican journal of neurodegenerative disease2020
Outcome of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to discogenic under percutaneous laser disc decompression.
Article in American journal of neurodegenerative disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- PERCUTANEOUS LASER DISC DECOMPRESSION FOR LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBMED IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Pooled it
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Bupivacaine Administration through Chest Tube and Intercostal Blockage in Patients with Rib Fractures.Advanced biomedical research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) method was first described by Daniel Choy in Australia in 1987. Therefore, in this study, we examined the clinical signs and symptoms of patients with spinal canal stenosis due to disc protrusion after PLDD surgery.
methodsIn this clinical trial study, 43 patients with spinal canal stenosis due to lumbar disks who referred to Kashani and Zahra Marzieh educational hospitals from 2006 to 2016 were entered the study. The patients were divided into two groups as discogenic canal stenosis (3 females and 9 males) and complex degenerative disorder (canal stenosis due to discogenic and ligamentos) (16 females and 15 males). Patients underwent PLDD surgery and the clinical manifestations such as back and radicular pain, claudication, and complications of the surgery (hematoma, reoperation, and neurological symptoms) in patients were evaluated until one year after the operation.
resultsAfter one year of surgery, the mean of back and radicular pains significantly decreased in both groups (P<0.05). All patients with claudication in the discogenic group improved and 35.5% of patients with complex degenerative disorder were not claudication after one year of surgery. The outcomes of treatment in patients with discogenic canal stenosis were 91.7% excellent, and 8.3% fair and in the complex degenerative disorder group were 64.5% excellent, 19.4% good and 16.1% fair (P=0.16). None of the patients had new neurological symptoms, and 12.9% of the complex degenerative disorder group patients needed reoperation.
conclusionThe PLDD method is a better procedure for discogenic canal stenosis than complex degenerative disorder. Therefore, more studies are required in this field for long time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33489482PMC7811930W3125449052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.