Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489431›Full record

ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2021

Characteristics and Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients Hospitalized in an Orthogeriatric Unit Versus an Orthopedic Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Yulia Bugaevsky, Yochai Levy, Avital Hershkovitz, Irena Ocheretny, Adaya Nissenholtz, Lisa Cooper, Yaara Leibovici Weissman, Avraham Weiss, Steven Velkes, Yichayaou Beloosesky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Types of Geriatric Assessment and Management Approaches to Hip Fracture.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yulia BugaevskyDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Yochai LevyDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Avital HershkovitzSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Irena OcheretnyDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Adaya NissenholtzDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Lisa CooperDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Yaara Leibovici WeissmanDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Avraham WeissDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Steven VelkesSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yichayaou BelooseskyDepartment of Acute Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1228-5229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHip fractures are a significant health risk in older adults and a major cause of morbidity, functional decline and mortality. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes of older patients hospitalized in an ortho-geriatric (OG) unit to those hospitalized in an orthopedic department (OD) for surgical treatment of a hip fracture.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of hip fractured patients hospitalized between 2015-2016 in a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center. Included were patients aged 65 and older who had undergone hip fracture surgery and were admitted to either a geriatric or orthopedic ward.

results441 patients met the inclusion criteria (195 in the OG unit, 246 in the OD); 257 were transferred to an affiliated geriatric center hospital (107 from the OG unit and 127 from the OD) for rehabilitation. Patients in the OG unit were older, more cognitively and functionally impaired and with more comorbidities. The 1-year mortality rate was significantly lower in the OD group (OR 0.32, CI 95% 0.19-0.53, p < 0.001), however, after propensity matching, the 30-day and 1 year mortality rates were similar in both groups. No difference was found in the rehabilitation length of stay between the groups. The functional independence measure improvement was similar in both groups, with a non-significant trend toward better functional improvement among OG unit patients.

conclusionsDespite the higher complexity of patients, worse baseline functional capacity in the OG unit, improvement after rehabilitation was similar in both groups. These results demonstrate the advantages of the OG unit in treating and stabilizing frail older adults, thus maximizing their chances for a successful recovery after hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

frail elderlygeriatric assessmenthip fracturespostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID33489431
PMCPMC7804357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.