Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489298›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2020

Computational animal welfare: towards cognitive architecture models of animal sentience, emotion and wellbeing.

Sergey Budaev, Tore S Kristiansen, Jarl Giske, Sigrunn Eliassen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergey BudaevDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-9795
Tore S KristiansenResearch Group Animal Welfare, Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870, 5817 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-0224
Jarl GiskeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5034-8177
Sigrunn EliassenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-3699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand animal wellbeing, we need to consider subjective phenomena and sentience. This is challenging, since these properties are private and cannot be observed directly. Certain motivations, emotions and related internal states can be inferred in animals through experiments that involve choice, learning, generalization and decision-making. Yet, even though there is significant progress in elucidating the neurobiology of human consciousness, animal consciousness is still a mystery. We propose that computational animal welfare science emerges at the intersection of animal behaviour, welfare and computational cognition. By using ideas from cognitive science, we develop a functional and generic definition of subjective phenomena as any process or state of the organism that exists from the first-person perspective and cannot be isolated from the animal subject. We then outline a general cognitive architecture to model simple forms of subjective processes and sentience. This includes evolutionary adaptation which contains top-down attention modulation, predictive processing and subjective simulation by re-entrant (recursive) computations. Thereafter, we show how this approach uses major characteristics of the subjective experience: elementary self-awareness, global workspace and qualia with unity and continuity. This provides a formal framework for process-based modelling of animal needs, subjective states, sentience and wellbeing.

Indexed as

animal welfaredigital twinmodelprecision livestock farmingsentiencewellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33489298
PMCPMC7813262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.