ArticleRoyal Society open science2020
Synchronization-based control for a collaborative robot.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis on collaborative robotics for industry: safety emerging as a core focus.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces a new control scheme for controlling a robotic manipulator in a collaborative task, allowing it to respond proactively to its partner's movements. Unlike conventional robotic systems, humans can operate in an unstructured, dynamic environment due to their ability to anticipate changes before they occur and react accordingly. Recreating this artificially by using a forward model would lead to the huge computational task of simulating a world full of complex nonlinear dynamics and autonomous human agents. In this study, a controller based on anticipating synchronization, where a 'leader' dynamical system is predicted by a coupled 'follower' with delayed self-feedback, is used to modify a robot's dynamical behaviour to follow that of a series of leaky integrators and harmonic oscillators. This allows the robot (follower) to be coupled with a collaborative partner (leader) to anticipate its movements, without a complete model of its behaviour. This is tested by tasking a simulated Baxter robot with performing a collaborative manual coordination task with an autonomous partner under a range of feedback delay conditions, confirming its ability to anticipate using oscillators instead of a detailed forward model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.