ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021
Catastrophic appendicitis operation, successful repair in tertiary limited resources hospital: A case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Cascade of Abscess, Fasciitis, and Obstruction: Rare Presentation of Perforated Appendicitis.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical diseases. Perforated appendicitis resulting in catastrophic complication because of a burst abdomen with necrotizing fasciitis of the abdominal wall is exceedingly a rare case. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 13-year-old girl with perforated appendicitis who had undergone laparotomy had to experience a burst abdomen with necrotizing fasciitis of the abdominal wall. The patient has temporarily closed the abdominal cavity with a urine bag (modified Bogota bag). After 23 times replacement of the Bogota bag and the condition of the sepsis and nutrition had improved, the abdominal wall reconstruction was performed by carrying out two random rotational flaps to close the abdominal defect. One year later, the patient came for ileocolostomy closure; then the patient was sent home with uneventful condition. DISCUSSION: Perforated appendicitis is a type of acute appendicitis with a low morbidity rate. Compared to other complications, burst abdomen and necrotizing fasciitis (NF) in perforated appendicitis are exceptionally rare events. Surgery with sepsis and recurrent intra-abdominal abscesses as a result of previous surgery are the causes of burst abdomen. The use of abdominal drainage has also been shown to cause NF. Both of these conditions will increase the cost and length of stay, and reduce the quality of life. The rotational flap procedure is the procedure of choice for a large burst abdomen.
conclusionSurgeons should and have to perform a meticulous operation to prevent catastrophic complication and to increase the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.