ArticleHealth information science and systems2021
GLIMPSE: a glioblastoma prognostication model using ensemble learning-a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of nutrition-related laboratory tests on mortality of patients who are critically ill using artificial intelligence: A focus on trace elements, vitamins, and cholesterol.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Article
- A review of machine learning-based methods for predicting drug-target interactions.Health information science and systems · 2024Review
- Methanolic Extract ofNutrients · 2024Article
- Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using modern deep learning and machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting Survival in Glioblastoma Using Gene Expression Databases: A Neural Network Analysis.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2024Article
- Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- AI and High-Grade Glioma for Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: Do All Machine Learning Models Perform Equally Well?Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGlioblastoma is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors in the world with a poor prognosis. A glioblastoma prognostication model has the potential to improve the cancer's standard of care. No other paper has looked at using ensemble learning with a population database to predict multiple binary glioblastoma survival outcomes.
methodsWe utilized ensemble learning to design, build, and test a prognostication system for glioblastoma for short-, intermediate- and long-term survival, based on various clinical features. We used the population database SEER which covers 17 different registries. The most important prognostic features were identified and used as a clinical feature set. The statistical feature set was determined using Random Forests. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were reported.
resultsStatistically-determined feature sets had the best performance. All the top models for short, intermediate, and long-term survival were random forests. With regards to short-term survival, top model had metrics AUROC = 0.937, accuracy = 86%, specificity = 88%, sensitivity = 85%, NPV = 85%, and PPV = 87%. For long-term survival, the top model had AUROC = 0.893, accuracy = 81%, specificity = 79%, sensitivity = 83%, NPV = 82%, and PPV = 79%. The top intermediate-term survival prediction had AUROC
conclusionsOur ensemble models were high-performing and achieved AUROCs as high as 0.94, highlighting the importance of balancing, using ensemble techniques and statistical feature selection. Our models can potentially be used by clinicians after external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.