Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489102›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2021

GLIMPSE: a glioblastoma prognostication model using ensemble learning-a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study.

Kamel A Samara, Zaher Al Aghbari, Amani Abusafia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of nutrition-related laboratory tests on mortality of patients who are critically ill using artificial intelligence: A focus on trace elements, vitamins, and cholesterol.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Methanolic Extract ofNutrients · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Survival in Glioblastoma Using Gene Expression Databases: A Neural Network Analysis.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kamel A SamaraCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-8536-6495
Zaher Al AghbariDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2285-953X
Amani AbusafiaSchool of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
University of Sharjah · AEThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioblastoma is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors in the world with a poor prognosis. A glioblastoma prognostication model has the potential to improve the cancer's standard of care. No other paper has looked at using ensemble learning with a population database to predict multiple binary glioblastoma survival outcomes.

methodsWe utilized ensemble learning to design, build, and test a prognostication system for glioblastoma for short-, intermediate- and long-term survival, based on various clinical features. We used the population database SEER which covers 17 different registries. The most important prognostic features were identified and used as a clinical feature set. The statistical feature set was determined using Random Forests. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were reported.

resultsStatistically-determined feature sets had the best performance. All the top models for short, intermediate, and long-term survival were random forests. With regards to short-term survival, top model had metrics AUROC = 0.937, accuracy = 86%, specificity = 88%, sensitivity = 85%, NPV = 85%, and PPV = 87%. For long-term survival, the top model had AUROC = 0.893, accuracy = 81%, specificity = 79%, sensitivity = 83%, NPV = 82%, and PPV = 79%. The top intermediate-term survival prediction had AUROC

conclusionsOur ensemble models were high-performing and achieved AUROCs as high as 0.94, highlighting the importance of balancing, using ensemble techniques and statistical feature selection. Our models can potentially be used by clinicians after external validation.

Indexed as

Ensemble learningFeature selectionGlioblastomaMachine learningPrognosisSEERSurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID33489102
PMCPMC7803850
OpenAlexW3125641916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.