Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489082›Full record

ReviewParkinson's disease2020

Self-Management Components as Experienced by People with Parkinson's Disease and Their Carers: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature.

Remco Tuijt, Aylin Tan, Megan Armstrong, Jennifer Pigott, Joy Read, Nathan Davies, Kate Walters, Anette Schrag

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Parkinson's disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. It Is Personal: What People with Parkinson's Disease Say Matters Most for Quality of Life.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Remco TuijtUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1147-8515
Aylin TanUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-9225
Megan ArmstrongUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-9393
Jennifer PigottUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-7941
Joy ReadUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3028-3975
Nathan DaviesUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7757-5353
Kate WaltersUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-2430
Anette SchragUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-6680

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1016-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management strategies are important in healthcare for people with Parkinson's to improve daily living. There is limited evidence on effectiveness in Parkinson's, and the active components of effective self-management strategies are uncertain. This review aims to identify and synthesise the qualitative evidence regarding the experiences of self-management components by people with Parkinson's and their carers.

methodsMEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to July 8, 2020, for qualitative research concerning self-management for people with Parkinson's. Data were coded and thematically synthesised using NVivo.

Identifiers

PMID33489082
PMCPMC7787805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.