Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33489002›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Machine learning applications in drug development.

Clémence Réda, Emilie Kaufmann, Andrée Delahaye-Duriez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In Silico Conotoxin Studies: Progress and Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Trends analysis and future study of the pharmaceutical industry field: a scoping review.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational Approaches: A New Frontier in Cancer Research.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication forBioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clémence RédaNeuroDiderot, UMR 1141, Inserm, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48, boulevard Sérurier, Paris 75019, France.
Emilie KaufmannUniv. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Inria, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL - Centre de Recherche en Informatique Signal et Automatique de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
Andrée Delahaye-DuriezNeuroDiderot, UMR 1141, Inserm, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48, boulevard Sérurier, Paris 75019, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the huge amount of biological and medical data available today, along with well-established machine learning algorithms, the design of largely automated drug development pipelines can now be envisioned. These pipelines may guide, or speed up, drug discovery; provide a better understanding of diseases and associated biological phenomena; help planning preclinical wet-lab experiments, and even future clinical trials. This automation of the drug development process might be key to the current issue of low productivity rate that pharmaceutical companies currently face. In this survey, we will particularly focus on two classes of methods: sequential learning and recommender systems, which are active biomedical fields of research.

Indexed as

Adaptive clinical trialBayesian optimizationCollaborative filteringDrug discoveryDrug repurposingMulti-armed bandit

Identifiers

PMID33489002
PMCPMC7790737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.