Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33488979›Full record

ArticleSAJCH : the South African journal of child health2018

Cultural consensus modelling to understand the reproductive health needs of South African adolescent girls.

J L Brown, J M Sales, C Sharp, J Cloete, M Lenka, K Rani, P Marime, I Ditlhare, R Moqolo, D Peterson and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAJCH : the South African journal of child health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cultural Consensus Modeling to Understand South African Adolescent Girls' Attitudes, Awareness, and Uptake of Dual Protection Strategies.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J L BrownDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
J M SalesDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
C SharpDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Texas, USA.
J CloeteCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
M LenkaCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
K RaniCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
P MarimeCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
I DitlhareCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
R MoqoloCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
D PetersonCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
L MaraisCentre for Development Support, Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
University of the Free State · ZAEmory University · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCultural consensus modelling (CCM) is an approach whereby individuals define the boundaries regarding a set of knowledge or behaviours shared by a group within a culture using an ethnographic approach.

objectivesTo provide an overview of CCM methods and the application of CCM to examine South African adolescent girls' contraceptive and HIV prevention practices.

methodsIn phase 1 of a CCM approach, individuals respond to questions about their culture rather than their individual behaviours, allowing individuals to draw upon a shared cultural knowledge. Utilising these identified group beliefs, phase 2 asks individuals to rate the extent to which factors identified in phase 1 are valued. Phase 3 utilises qualitative interviews with key informants from phase 2 to gather in-depth information regarding the identified determinants of the health behaviour. Lastly, phase 4 of this approach conducts a quantitative survey to determine the extent to which cultural consensus model types are associated with differences in actual behaviours.

resultsCCM data analytic approaches are described. Frequencies and descriptive statistics for the free listing are conducted. For phase 2, cultural consensus analysis is conducted to examine whether one or several consensus models exist and competence scores are calculated. Standard qualitative analysis approaches are utilised for phase 3. Phase 4 employs regression to examine the association between cultural models and an outcome of interest.

conclusionCCM provides a novel, culturally sensitive understanding of reproductive health practices among South African adolescent girls; CCM also has broad applicability to other adolescent health research domains.

Identifiers

PMID33488979
PMCPMC7745120
OpenAlexW2889874044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.