Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33488818›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2020

Association Between Preventive Behaviour and Anxiety at the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Slovenia.

Nevenka Kregar Velikonja, Karmen Erjavec, Ivan Verdenik, Mohsen Hussein, Vislava Globevnik Velikonja

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Seroprevalence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Following the Omicron BA.1 Wave.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nevenka Kregar VelikonjaUniversity of Novo mesto Faculty of Health Sciences, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia.
Karmen ErjavecUniversity of Novo mesto Faculty of Health Sciences, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia.
Ivan VerdenikUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Division for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mohsen HusseinUniversity of Novo mesto Faculty of Health Sciences, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia.
Vislava Globevnik VelikonjaUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Division for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Higher Education Centre Novo Mesto · SILjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe first large outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe occurred in Northern Italy in February 2020. The relatively fast spread of the infection to Slovenia was expected, and preventive measures for its suppression were widely discussed.

methodsAn online questionnaire was designed to evaluate adherence to preventive measures and the extent to which the taking of preventive measures was associated with people's anxiety level, psychological burden, their perceived vulnerability to disease, germ aversion and a number of demographic characteristics in the early stage of Covid-19 spread. The survey was active for 24 hours (13-14 March 2020). There were 12,307 responses and 7,764 questionnaires were completed in full.

resultsHigher preventive behaviour was found in individuals who experienced greater psychological distress, were more anxious, and expressed greater perceived infectability and germ aversion. Greater compliance with preventive behaviour was found among women, those sharing a household with people aged over 65, the elderly and those who knew somebody who had been infected. These groups also showed higher anxiety levels, which appeared to be significantly increased in general as a result of the specific situation. Quarantine was evaluated as the most efficient preventive measure, and was respected relatively strictly even before it became an officially announced protective measure.

conclusionThis research reveals a strong association between preventive behaviour and anxiety. Anxiety, together with social distancing, may affect physical and psychological health in the population in the long term. Other aspects of public health might therefore be influenced by the measures currently being enforced to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

anxietyinfectabilityperceivedpreventive behaviourpreventive measurespublic healthSARS-CoV-2 epidemic

Identifiers

PMID33488818
PMCPMC7780767
OpenAlexW3120129670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.