Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33488615›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Targeted De-Methylation of the FOXP3-TSDR Is Sufficient to Induce Physiological FOXP3 Expression but Not a Functional Treg Phenotype.

Christopher Kressler, Gilles Gasparoni, Karl Nordström, Dania Hamo, Abdulrahman Salhab, Christoforos Dimitropoulos, Sascha Tierling, Petra Reinke, Hans-Dieter Volk, Jörn Walter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Engineering CAR-Tregs with Phage-Selected scFv Enables a New Paradigm for Immune Regulation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher KresslerBerlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gilles GasparoniGenetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Karl NordströmGenetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Dania HamoBerlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Abdulrahman SalhabGenetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Christoforos DimitropoulosImmuno-Epigenetics, German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ), Berlin, Germany.
Sascha TierlingGenetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Petra ReinkeBerlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hans-Dieter VolkBerlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jörn WalterGenetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Alf HamannImmuno-Epigenetics, German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ), Berlin, Germany.
Julia K PolanskyBerlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Saarland University · DEGerman Rheumatism Research Centre · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) are key mediators of immunological tolerance and promising effector cells for immuno-suppressive adoptive cellular therapy to fight autoimmunity and chronic inflammation. Their functional stability is critical for their clinical utility and has been correlated to the demethylated state of the TSDR/CNS2 enhancer element in the Treg lineage transcription factor FOXP3. However, proof for a causal contribution of the TSDR de-methylation to FOXP3 stability and Treg induction is so far lacking. We here established a powerful transient-transfection CRISPR-Cas9-based epigenetic editing method for the selective de-methylation of the TSDR within the endogenous chromatin environment of a living cell. The induced de-methylated state was stable over weeks in clonal T cell proliferation cultures even after expression of the editing complex had ceased. Epigenetic editing of the TSDR resulted in FOXP3 expression, even in its physiological isoform distribution, proving a causal role for the de-methylated TSDR in FOXP3 regulation. However, successful FOXP3 induction was not associated with a switch towards a functional Treg phenotype, in contrast to what has been reported from FOXP3 overexpression approaches. Thus, TSDR de-methylation is required, but not sufficient for a stable Treg phenotype induction. Therefore, targeted demethylation of the TSDR may be a critical addition to published

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA MethylationForkhead Transcription FactorsGene EditingGene Expression RegulationHumansJurkat CellsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhenotypeTh1 CellsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, humanadoptive T cell therapiesCRISPR-Cas9-based toolepigenetic editinggene regulationregulatory T cellsT cell differentiation

Identifiers

PMID33488615
PMCPMC7817622
OpenAlexW3119416839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.