ReviewFrontiers in physiology2020
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Membrane Oxygenation Improves Functional Myocardial Preservation and Enables Colloid-Enriched Perfusion in the Langendorff Isolated Heart Model.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomimetic electrospun scaffolds for engineered heart tissue: from design parameters to drug testing platforms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Heart immunoengineering by lentiviral vector-mediated genetic modification during normothermicFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Sex-specific responses to slow progressive pressure overload in a large animal model of HFpEF.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Article
- Physiology of the Right Ventricle Across the Lifespan.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and thousands of manuscripts each year are aimed at elucidating mechanisms underlying cardiac disease. The methods for quantifying cardiac performance are quite varied, with each technique assessing unique features of cardiac muscle mechanical properties. Accordingly, in this review, we discuss current
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.