Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33488349›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Cortical Thickness in Migraine: A Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis.

LiQin Sheng, HaiRong Ma, YuanYuan Shi, ZhenYu Dai, JianGuo Zhong, Fei Chen, PingLei Pan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating migraine with typical aura with neuroimaging.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

LiQin ShengDepartment of Neurology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China.
HaiRong MaDepartment of Neurology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China.
YuanYuan ShiDepartment of Central Laboratory, School of Medicine, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, Southeast University, Yancheng, China.
ZhenYu DaiDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, Southeast University, Yancheng, China.
JianGuo ZhongDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, Southeast University, Yancheng, China.
Fei ChenDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, Southeast University, Yancheng, China.
PingLei PanDepartment of Central Laboratory, School of Medicine, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, Southeast University, Yancheng, China.
Yancheng Third People's Hospital · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNTraditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical thickness (CTh) via surface-based morphometry analysis is a popular method to characterize brain morphometry. Many studies have been performed to investigate CTh abnormalities in migraine. However, the results from these studies were not consistent and even conflicting. These divergent results hinder us to obtain a clear picture of brain morphometry regarding CTh alterations in migraine. Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is a promising technique to quantitatively pool individual neuroimaging studies to identify consistent brain areas involved. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and SinoMed) and other sources (bioRxiv and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews) were systematically searched for studies that compared regional CTh differences between patients with migraine and healthy controls (HCs) up to May 15, 2020. A CBMA was performed using the Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images approach. In total, we identified 16 studies with 17 datasets reported that were eligible for the CBMA. The 17 datasets included 872 patients with migraine (average sample size 51.3, mean age 39.6 years, 721 females) and 949 HCs (average sample size 59.3, mean age 44.2 years, 680 females). The CBMA detected no statistically significant consistency of CTh alterations in patients with migraine relative to HCs. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis verified this result to be robust. Metaregression analyses revealed that this CBMA result was not confounded by age, gender, aura, attack frequency per month, and illness duration. Our CBMA adds to the evidence of the replication crisis in neuroimaging research that is increasingly recognized. Many potential confounders, such as underpowered sample size, heterogeneous patient selection criteria, and differences in imaging collection and methodology, may contribute to the inconsistencies of CTh alterations in migraine, which merit attention before planning future research on this topic.

Indexed as

coordinate-based meta-analysiscortical thicknessmigraineseed-based d mapping with permutation of subject imagessurface-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID33488349
PMCPMC7815689
OpenAlexW3118409237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.