Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33488173›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of chemistry2020

Combined computational and experimental studies on cysteine-sulfadiazine adduct formation.

Nursel Acar SelÇukİ, Emine CoŞkun, Ender BİÇer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nursel Acar SelÇukİDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-0637
Emine CoŞkunDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Science, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Atakum, Samsun Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-256X
Ender BİÇerDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Science, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Atakum, Samsun Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-5160
Ondokuz Mayıs University · TREge University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrochemical characterization of sulfadiazine-cysteine (SD-CYS) adduct formation was performed in phosphate buffer (pH 7) on the basis of voltammetric current and peak potential measurements. Due to the association of cysteine with sulfadiazine, the reduction peak currents of mercuric and mercurous cysteine thiolates decreased and their peak potentials simultaneously shifted to less negative potentials. By using the current changes of mercurous cysteine thiolate, it was determined that cysteine and sulfadiazine are associated with a 1:1 stoichiometry with a conditional association constant of 1.99 ×104 M-1 . In addition to experimental studies, a computational approach was carried out to study the geometrical parameters, electron densities, and UV-Vis absorption spectra of sulfadiazine and SDCYS adduct in water. Calculated (B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level) and experimental UV-Vis absorption spectra of the compounds were found to be in good agreement in water. The computational study suggests that cysteine bound to the C(5) on the pyrimidine ring via SH-group nucleophilic attack. Computational results reveal that sulfadiazine and its derivatives effectively bind cysteine and may lead to new molecules/drugs to target cysteine.

Indexed as

Cysteine-sulfadiazine adductdensity functional theorynucleophilic attack

Identifiers

PMID33488173
PMCPMC7671221
OpenAlexW3014394746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.