Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33487985›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2020

Nalisa Khochamit, Surasak Siripornadulsil, Peerapol Sukon, Wilailak Siripornadulsil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. In vitro probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of Muscovy ducks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  9. Enhancing resistance toFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nalisa KhochamitDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Surasak SiripornadulsilDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Peerapol SukonResearch Group for Preventive Technology in Livestock, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Wilailak SiripornadulsilDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Khon Kaen University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the study was to determine the potentials and effects of MATERIALS AND

methodsTo evaluate the inoculum size applicable for broilers, 1-day-old broilers were orally fed fresh cultures of single strains and a

resultsThe broilers fed single strains or KKU213+NP6 exhibited a higher BWG and a higher crop LAB abundance than the controls (p<0.05). Probiotic feeding decreased the intestinal

conclusion

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisbroilerlactic acid bacteriaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID33487985
PMCPMC7811549
OpenAlexW3110930231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.