Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33487744›Full record

ArticleThe Linacre quarterly2021

The Vatican Opinion on Gender Theory.

Julio Tudela, Enrique Burguete, Justo Aznar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Linacre quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julio TudelaInstitute of Life Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Spain.
Enrique BurgueteInstitute of Life Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Spain.
Justo AznarInstitute of Life Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-4932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is a reasoned response to the article by Timothy F. Murphy, recently published in the prestigious journal SUMMARY: This paper is a reasoned response to the supposed opposition between the views of the Catholic Church and "contemporary science" in relation to certain anthropological issues linked to the gender perspective.The dialogue between Faith and Reason, as developed in the recent Magisterium of the Catholic Church, is essential to explain nature, the human being and, in general, all creation, against the opinion of those who defend the obsolescence of the binary sex/gender model that, in their view, "betrays human sexuality".

Indexed as

Binary sex/genderGender theoryHuman sexualityTransgenderismVatican opinion

Identifiers

PMID33487744
PMCPMC7804515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.