Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33487678›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2020

Comparison of paediatric King Vision™ videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for elective tracheal intubation in children of age less than 1 year: A randomised clinical trial.

Manov Manirajan, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar, Ranjith Kumar Sivakumar, Suman Lata, Gnanasekaran Srinivasan, Ajay Kumar Jha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manov ManirajanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Puducherry, India.
Prasanna Udupi BidkarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Puducherry, India.
Ranjith Kumar SivakumarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Puducherry, India.
Suman LataDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Puducherry, India.
Gnanasekaran SrinivasanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Puducherry, India.
Ajay Kumar JhaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPaediatric airway, because of its consistent anatomical differences from that of an adult, often encounters difficulty in aligning the line of sight with the laryngeal inlet during intubation. Paediatric videolaryngoscopes (VLs), by obviating the need for aligning the line of sight with the glottis, offer several advantages over direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the recently introduced paediatric King Vision™ VL (KVL) and the direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade for elective tracheal intubation in infants of age <1 year.

methodsSeventy-eight infants of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2, scheduled for elective surgery, were enrolled for this prospective randomised clinical trial and randomised into either of the two groups - Group K and Group C, where the infants were intubated using size 1 King Vision or direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade. The primary objective of this study was the time taken for intubation and the first-attempt intubation success rate.

resultsTime to intubate (25.90 ± 2.34 s vs. 25.03 ± 1.42 s,

conclusionThe outcome of KVL and Macintosh laryngoscope was similar in terms of time taken for intubation and first-attempt intubation success rate with KVL having superior glottic visualisation, better ease of intubation and lower intubation difficulty score for elective intubations in children of age <1 year.

Indexed as

Airwaydirect laryngoscopeglottis visualisationinfantsintubation successKing VisionMacintosh bladevideolaryngoscope

Identifiers

PMID33487678
PMCPMC7815006
OpenAlexW3096575484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.