Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33487597›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2021

Bead-based Padlock Rolling Circle Amplification under Molecular Crowding Conditions: The Effects of Crowder Charge and Size.

Naoki Sasaki, Chikako Kase, Kae Sato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. J-aggregation of 5, 10, 15, 20-tetraphenyl-21H, 23H-porphinetetrasulfonic acid in a molecular crowding environment simulated using dextran.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naoki SasakiDepartment of Chemistry College of Science, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo, 171-8501, Japan. n_sasaki@rikkyo.ac.jp.
Chikako KaseDepartment of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Japan Women's University, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 112-8681, Japan.
Kae SatoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Japan Women's University, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 112-8681, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bead-based padlock rolling circle amplification under molecular crowding conditions, which we have developed for ultrasensitive detection of DNA, is examined to improve the detection efficiency and sensitivity of the method as well as to gain insight into the mechanism of the method. Both non-magnetic and magnetic sepharose microbeads were employed. Biotinylated DNA had to be pre-immobilized onto the microbeads in order to obtain products on the magnetic beads. The optimal concentration of biotinylated DNA was found to be about 5 μM, above which the number of products decreased. The effect of the crowder charge was examined, and neutral polymers were found to be effective on ligation and the hybridization step, while charged polymers were only effective on the hybridization step and inhibited the ligation and primer extension. The effect of the molecular weight of neutral dextran on the number of products was investigated, and the number of products was found to be increased with an increase in the molecular weight of dextran.

Indexed as

DNANucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesMagneticsMicrospheresNucleic Acid HybridizationDNAcrowdingdextranMicrobeadRCA

Identifiers

PMID33487597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.