Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33487468›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

Proof-of-concept of a low-dose unmodified mRNA-based rabies vaccine formulated with lipid nanoparticles in human volunteers: A phase 1 trial.

Cassandra Aldrich, Isabel Leroux-Roels, Katell Bidet Huang, Mihai Alexandru Bica, Edde Loeliger, Oliver Schoenborn-Kellenberger, Lisa Walz, Geert Leroux-Roels, Frank von Sonnenburg, Lidia Oostvogels

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713086 (A Non-Randomized, Open Label, Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of One or Two Administrations of Candidate Rabies mRNA Vaccine CV7202 in Healthy Adult Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03713086 phase1completednot on this map

A Non-Randomized, Open Label, Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of One or Two Administrations of Candidate Rabies mRNA Vaccine CV7202 in Healthy Adult Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorCureVacRan2018 to 2021Enrolled53ConditionsRabiesArmsRabipur®, Rabies mRNA vaccine CV7202
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Rational design of lipid nanoparticles for enabling gene therapies.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cassandra AldrichDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Isabel Leroux-RoelsCenter for Vaccinology, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Katell Bidet HuangCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Mihai Alexandru BicaCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Edde LoeligerCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver Schoenborn-KellenbergerCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Lisa WalzCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Geert Leroux-RoelsCenter for Vaccinology, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Frank von SonnenburgDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lidia OostvogelsCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: lidia.oostvogels@curevac.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn a first-in-human study immune responses to rabies virus glycoprotein (RABV-G)-mRNA vaccine were dependent on the route of administration, necessitating specialized devices. Following successful preclinical studies with mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP), we tested an mRNA-LNP formulation (CV7202).

methodsIn this phase 1, multi-center, controlled study in Belgium and Germany we enrolled 55 healthy 18-40-year-olds to receive intramuscular injections of 5 μg (n = 10), 1 μg (n = 16), or 2 μg (n = 16) CV7202 on Day 1; subsets (n = 8) of 1 μg and 2 μg groups received second doses on Day 29. Controls (n = 10) received rabies vaccine, Rabipur, on Days 1, 8 and 29. Safety and reactogenicity were assessed up to 28 days post-vaccination using diary cards; immunogenicity was measured as RABV-G-specific neutralizing titers (VNT) by RFFIT and IgG by ELISA.

resultsAs initially tested doses of 5 μg CV7202 elicited unacceptably high reactogenicity we subsequently tested 1 and 2 μg doses which were better tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or withdrawals occurred. Low, dose-dependent VNT responses were detectable from Day 15 and by Day 29%, 31% and 22% of 1, 2 and 5 μg groups, respectively, had VNTs ≥ 0·5 IU/mL, considered an adequate response by the WHO. After two 1 or 2 μg doses all recipients had titers ≥ 0.5 IU/mL by Day 43. Day 57 GMTs were not significantly lower than those with Rabipur, which elicited adequate responses in all vaccinees after two doses. CV7202-elicited VNT were significantly correlated with RABV-G-specific IgG antibodies (r

conclusionsTwo 1 μg or 2 μg doses of CV7202 were well tolerated and elicited rabies neutralizing antibody responses that met WHO criteria in all recipients, but 5 μg had unacceptable reactogenicity for a prophylactic vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03713086.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesRabies VaccinesAntibodies, ViralBelgiumGermanyHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineLipidsRNA, MessengerAntibodies, ViralLipidsRabies VaccinesRNA, MessengerLipid nanoparticlesmRNARabiesVaccine

Identifiers

PMID33487468
PMCPMC7825876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.