ArticleMicrobiome2021
Microbiome dynamics during the HI-SEAS IV mission, and implications for future crewed missions beyond Earth.
Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- First-year dynamics of the anaerobic microbiome and archaeome in infants' oral and gastrointestinal systems.mSystems · 2025Article
- Impact of simulated microgravity in short-term evolution of an RNA bacteriophage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The indoors microbiome and human health.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Microbiota and probiotics: chances and challenges - a symposium report.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Skin Microbial Changes during Space Flights: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Passive limitation of surface contamination by perFluoroDecylTrichloroSilane coatings in the ISS during the MATISS experiments.NPJ microgravity · 2022Article
- Article
- Microbiomes of air dust collected during the ground-based closed bioregenerative life support experiment "Lunar Palace 365".Environmental microbiome · 2022Article
- The rising dominance of microbiology: what to expect in the next 15 years?Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- Space Flight-Promoted Insulin Resistance as a Possible Disruptor of Wound Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Development of a data science CURE in microbiology using publicly available microbiome datasets.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Conjugation acrossFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Advances in experimental and computational methodologies for the study of microbial-surface interactions at different omics levels.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Microbial Pathogenicity in Space.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- How the Immune System Deploys Creativity: Why We Can Learn From Astronauts and Cosmonauts.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman health is closely interconnected with its microbiome. Resilient microbiomes in, on, and around the human body will be key for safe and successful long-term space travel. However, longitudinal dynamics of microbiomes inside confined built environments are still poorly understood. Herein, we used the Hawaii Space Exploration Analog and Simulation IV (HI-SEAS IV) mission, a 1 year-long isolation study, to investigate microbial transfer between crew and habitat, in order to understand adverse developments which may occur in a future outpost on the Moon or Mars.
resultsLongitudinal 16S rRNA gene profiles, as well as quantitative observations, revealed significant differences in microbial diversity, abundance, and composition between samples of the built environment and its crew. The microbiome composition and diversity associated with abiotic surfaces was found to be rather stable, whereas the microbial skin profiles of individual crew members were highly dynamic, resulting in an increased microbiome diversity at the end of the isolation period. The skin microbiome dynamics were especially pronounced by a regular transfer of the indicator species Methanobrevibacter between crew members within the first 200 days. Quantitative information was used to track the propagation of antimicrobial resistance in the habitat. Together with functional and phenotypic predictions, quantitative and qualitative data supported the observation of a delayed longitudinal microbial homogenization between crew and habitat surfaces which was mainly caused by a malfunctioning sanitary facility.
conclusionsThis study highlights main routes of microbial transfer, interaction of the crew, and origins of microbial dynamics in an isolated environment. We identify key targets of microbial monitoring, and emphasize the need for defined baselines of microbiome diversity and abundance on surfaces and crew skin. Targeted manipulation to counteract adverse developments of the microbiome could be a highly important strategy to ensure safety during future space endeavors. Video abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.