Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33487107›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Reframing cognition: getting down to biological basics.

Pamela Lyon, Fred Keijzer, Detlev Arendt, Michael Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Continual decision-making dynamics across biological organisms.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Reductionism in Engram Neuroscience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Early transitions in the evolution of cognition.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The fish challenge to vertebrate cognitive evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The need for a new perspective on decision-making in bacteria.Communicative & integrative biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Open problems in synthetic multicellularity.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pamela LyonSouthgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
Fred KeijzerDepartment of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, Groningen 9712GL, The Netherlands.
Detlev ArendtDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69012 Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael LevinAllen Discovery Center at Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The premise of this two-part theme issue is simple: the cognitive sciences should join the rest of the life sciences in how they approach the quarry within their research domain. Specifically, understanding how organisms on the lower branches of the phylogenetic tree become familiar with, value and exploit elements of an ecological niche while avoiding harm can be expected to aid understanding of how organisms that evolved later (including

Indexed as

CognitionPlant Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCognitive ScienceEukaryotic CellsInvertebratesProkaryotic CellsVertebratesaneural cognitioncognitiondevelopmental biologyeukaryotesneuroscienceprokaryotes

Identifiers

PMID33487107
PMCPMC7935032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.