Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486848›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2021

Application of convolutional neural network on early human embryo segmentation during in vitro fertilization.

Mingpeng Zhao, Murong Xu, Hanhui Li, Odai Alqawasmeh, Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung, Tin Chiu Li, Tin-Lap Lee, Patrick Ming-Kuen Tang, David Yiu Leung Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mingpeng ZhaoAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-7048
Murong XuAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-1480
Hanhui LiSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic and Technology, Guilin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-6532
Odai AlqawasmehAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-5741
Jacqueline Pui Wah ChungAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9742-578X
Tin Chiu LiAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0554-2031
Tin-Lap LeeSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-0988
Patrick Ming-Kuen TangDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3194-3736
David Yiu Leung ChanAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-8262

Funding

Direct Grant for Research 4054510Faculty Innovation Award 4620528Health and Medical Research Fund 06170246Health and Medical Research Fund 07180566Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 14106518Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 14111019Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 14111720The Hong Kong Obstetrical & Gynaecological Trust Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection of the best quality embryo is the key for a faithful implantation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice. However, the process of evaluating numerous images captured by time-lapse imaging (TLI) system is time-consuming and some important features cannot be recognized by naked eyes. Convolutional neural network (CNN) is used in medical imaging yet in IVF. The study aims to apply CNN on day-one human embryo TLI. We first presented CNN algorithm for day-one human embryo segmentation on three distinct features: zona pellucida (ZP), cytoplasm and pronucleus (PN). We tested the CNN performance compared side-by-side with manual labelling by clinical embryologist, then measured the segmented day-one human embryo parameters and compared them with literature reported values. The precisions of segmentation were that cytoplasm over 97%, PN over 84% and ZP around 80%. For the morphometrics data of cytoplasm, ZP and PN, the results were comparable with those reported in literatures, which showed high reproducibility and consistency. The CNN system provides fast and stable analytical outcome to improve work efficiency in IVF setting. To conclude, our CNN system is potential to be applied in practice for day-one human embryo segmentation as a robust tool with high precision, reproducibility and speed.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFertilization in VitroModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedFemaleHumansPregnancyTime-Lapse Imagingconvolutional neural networkcytoplasmday-one human embryo segmentationpronucleustime-lapse imagingzona pellucida

Identifiers

PMID33486848
PMCPMC7933952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.