Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486707›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2021

Modeling Within-Item Dependencies in Parallel Data on Test Responses and Brain Activation.

Minjeong Jeon, Paul De Boeck, Jevan Luo, Xiangrui Li, Zhong-Lin Lu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minjeong JeonDepartment of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, 3141 Moore Hall, 457 Portola Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. mjjeon@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-4146
Paul De BoeckOhio State University, 225 Psychology Building 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jevan LuoDepartment of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, 3141 Moore Hall, 457 Portola Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
Xiangrui LiOhio State University, 225 Psychology Building 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Zhong-Lin LuDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Pl, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a joint modeling approach to analyze dependency in parallel response data. We define two types of dependency: higher-level dependency and within-item conditional dependency. While higher-level dependency can be estimated with common latent variable modeling approaches, within-item conditional dependency is a unique kind of information that is often not captured with extant methods, despite its potential to shed new insights into the relationship between the two types of response data. We differentiate three ways of modeling within-item conditional dependency by conditioning on raw values, expected values, or residual values of the response data, which have different implications in terms of response processes. The proposed approach is illustrated with the example of analyzing parallel data on response accuracy and brain activations from a Theory of Mind assessment. The consequence of ignoring within-item conditional dependency is investigated with empirical and simulation studies in comparison to conventional dependency analysis that focuses exclusively on relationships between latent variables.

Indexed as

BrainComputer SimulationLatent Class AnalysisPsychometricsconditional dependencyfMRI activationsjoint analysisparallel dataresponse accuracytheory of mind

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.